QUICK INFO BOX

Introduction

Software engineering is fundamentally constrained by context. The average developer can hold 100-200 lines of code in working memory—yet modern codebases span millions of lines across hundreds of files, dozens of services, thousands of dependencies. The result:

1. Onboarding hell: New engineers spending 3-6 months understanding codebases before contributing productively
2. Architecture decay: Nobody understanding entire system—changes creating unintended side effects
3. Technical debt: Refactoring impossible (too risky, too complex)—debt accumulating indefinitely
4. Context switching: Engineers spending 60%+ time navigating code, searching documentation, remembering APIs
5. Scaling limits: Teams adding 10th engineer delivering <10% marginal productivity (coordination overhead)

AI coding assistants (GitHub Copilot, Poolside) help with single-file changes—but fail when tasks require understanding across codebases:

Example limitations:

• Copilot: Suggests next line (analyzes ~2,000 tokens of context)—can’t refactor architecture spanning 50+ files
• Poolside: Generates functions (analyzes ~8,000 tokens)—can’t migrate database schemas affecting 200+ models
• ChatGPT Code Interpreter: Answers questions (analyzes ~32,000 tokens)—can’t understand microservices architecture with 1M+ lines

The bottleneck: Context window. Current LLMs process 4K-128K tokens (roughly 3K-96K lines)—yet real engineering tasks require understanding millions of lines simultaneously.

What if AI could hold entire codebases in memory—100 million tokens (75 million lines of code), understanding every function, class, API, database schema, service interaction? Not generating suggestions, but autonomous software engineer reasoning about architecture, planning refactors, implementing features across dozens of files?

Enter Magic, the AI research lab building LTM-2 (Long-Term Memory 2)—foundation model with 100 million token context window (500x larger than GPT-4’s 200K)—enabling AI software engineers understanding entire codebases, planning complex refactors, and autonomously implementing multi-file features. Founded in 2022 by Eric Steinberger (CEO, ex-competitive poker player turned AI researcher) and Sebastian De Ro (CTO, ex-Google Brain researcher), Magic develops AI that thinks like senior software architect—reasoning about system design, managing technical debt, coordinating changes across codebases.

As of February 2026, Magic operates at a $1.5 billion valuation with $465 million in funding from CapitalG (Alphabet’s growth fund), Elad Gil, Nat Friedman (ex-GitHub CEO), Atlas Venture, Sequoia Capital, and Jane Street Capital. The company employs 90+ researchers and engineers (February 2026) training LTM-2 on custom infrastructure (3,000+ NVIDIA H100 GPUs). Magic remains in private beta with 50+ companies testing autonomous software engineering—with commercial launch planned for late 2026.

What makes Magic revolutionary:

1. 100M token context: 500x larger than GPT-4—holding entire codebases (millions of lines) in single inference
2. Autonomous engineering: Not suggesting edits—planning and implementing features independently (multi-day tasks)
3. Architecture understanding: Reasoning about system design (microservices, databases, APIs)—not just syntax
4. Multi-repository: Understanding dependencies across repos (frontend, backend, infrastructure)—coordinating changes
5. Long-term reasoning: Planning refactors over weeks—managing technical debt systematically

The market opportunity spans $150+ billion software engineering labor, $500+ billion developer productivity, and $30+ billion AI coding assistants. Every company employs software engineers (startups 5-20, enterprises 1,000-10,000+)—seeking 10x productivity or autonomous alternatives. Magic provides AI software engineer replacing junior/mid-level developers for routine tasks—freeing humans for architecture, design, strategy.

Magic competes with Cognition Devin ($2B valuation, autonomous coding agent), Imbue ($1B valuation, reasoning agents), Poolside ($3B valuation, AI coding assistant), GitHub Copilot ($10B+ value), Cursor ($400M valuation), and Replit Ghostwriter. Magic differentiates through 100M context window (500x competitors), autonomous execution (multi-day tasks vs. suggestions), architecture reasoning (system-level understanding), and founder pedigree (ex-competitive poker player’s strategic thinking + Google Brain researcher’s ML expertise).

The founding story reflects unconventional backgrounds: Eric Steinberger (professional poker player earning millions, then switching to AI research) and Sebastian De Ro (Google Brain researcher on Transformers, attention mechanisms) believed software engineering’s bottleneck was context—not model size, not training data. After discovering novel attention mechanisms enabling 100M+ token contexts, they founded Magic to build AI software engineer limited only by available code (not context windows).

This comprehensive article explores Magic’s journey from research vision to the $1.5 billion AI software engineer with 100M token context.

Founding Story & Background

The Context Window Bottleneck (2020-2022)

By 2022, AI coding assistants demonstrated value:

GitHub Copilot (2021): 10M+ users, $1B+ revenue potential
AlphaCode (DeepMind, 2022): Competitive programming (50th percentile)
Codex (OpenAI, 2021): Powering Copilot, GPT-3 fine-tuned on code

Yet all models shared fundamental limitation: Small context windows

Context window sizes (2022):

• GPT-3: 2,048 tokens (~1,500 lines of code)
• Codex: 8,192 tokens (~6,000 lines)
• GPT-3.5: 4,096 tokens (~3,000 lines)
• GPT-4 (2023): 8,192 tokens (later 32K, 128K, 200K variants)

Problem: Real software engineering requires understanding entire codebases:

• Small startup: 50K-500K lines (10-100 files)
• Mid-size company: 1M-10M lines (1,000-5,000 files)
• Large enterprise: 100M+ lines (10,000+ files, multiple repos)

Example task impossible with small contexts:

“Refactor authentication system from OAuth 1.0 to OAuth 2.0 across frontend (React), backend (Django), mobile apps (iOS, Android), and update API documentation.”

Requires understanding:

• Frontend: 200+ React components (50K lines)
• Backend: 500+ Django views, models, serializers (200K lines)
• Mobile: 300+ screens, network layer (150K lines iOS, 150K lines Android)
• Docs: 50+ API endpoint documentation files

Total context: 550K+ lines (~700K tokens)—exceeding any model’s capacity by 5-50x.

Eric Steinberger: From Poker to AI

Eric Steinberger (co-founder, CEO) has unconventional background:

2010-2016: Professional Poker

• Earnings: $3M+ tournament winnings (high-stakes poker)
• Skills: Game theory, probabilistic reasoning, long-term strategy, risk management
• Insight: Poker requires holding complex game states in memory—opponent tendencies, hand ranges, bet sizing patterns—spanning hours of play

2016-2020: Transition to AI

• Self-taught ML: Online courses (Stanford CS229, fast.ai), implementing papers
• Poker bots: Building reinforcement learning agents (inspired by Libratus, Pluribus)
• Observation: RL agents need memory mechanisms—tracking opponent patterns over thousands of hands

2020-2022: Context Window Research

• Problem obsession: Why can’t AI hold large contexts like human experts?
• Human comparison: Senior engineer holds 100K+ lines of codebase structure in long-term memory (not working memory, but retrievable)
• Hypothesis: Novel attention mechanisms could enable 10M-100M token contexts

Sebastian De Ro: Google Brain and Attention Mechanisms

Sebastian De Ro (co-founder, CTO):

2017-2021: Google Brain

• Research focus: Attention mechanisms, transformer optimizations, long-range dependencies
• Contributions: Papers on efficient attention (sparse attention, local attention, memory-augmented transformers)
• Observation: Attention complexity grows O(n²) with sequence length—limiting context windows to 10K-100K tokens

Breakthrough research (2021):

• Linear attention: Reducing O(n²) to O(n) through kernel approximations
• Hierarchical memory: Multi-level attention (local + global)
• Sparse retrieval: Attending only to relevant tokens (not all tokens)

Result: Theoretical path to 10M-100M token contexts at reasonable compute cost.

2022: Founding Magic

In March 2022, Steinberger and De Ro met at AI conference (NeurIPS) and discovered shared obsession: context bottleneck.

Steinberger: “Poker players remember opponent patterns across days of play—why can’t AI remember codebases?”

De Ro: “I’ve built attention mechanisms enabling 10M+ token contexts—but nobody’s applied them to software engineering.”

Founding thesis: Software engineering is memory problem (not just pattern matching). AI software engineer needs to:

1. Remember architecture: System design, service dependencies, database schemas
2. Track changes over time: Git history, refactoring decisions, technical debt
3. Coordinate multi-file changes: Planning refactors spanning dozens of files

They founded Magic in San Francisco (April 2022) with mission:

“Build AI software engineer with human-level codebase understanding through 100M+ token context windows.”

Initial focus: Novel attention mechanisms enabling 10M-100M tokens, training code models with long contexts.

2022: Seed and LTM-1 Prototype

Seed (May 2022): $28 Million

• Lead: Atlas Venture
• Additional: Elad Gil, Nat Friedman (ex-GitHub CEO)
• Purpose: Core research team (12 people), GPU infrastructure, attention mechanism research

Nat Friedman’s involvement (former GitHub CEO, 2018-2021) critical:

• Copilot experience: Launched first AI coding assistant—understanding limitations
• Market validation: Copilot proved demand—but context window limited use cases
• Distribution: Friedman’s GitHub network (potential customers, talent)

By December 2022, Magic demoed LTM-1 (Long-Term Memory 1):

Capabilities:

• 10 million token context: 70x larger than GPT-4 (8K tokens at time)
• Attention mechanism: Novel sparse attention + hierarchical memory—reducing O(n²) to O(n log n)
• Codebase understanding: Analyzing entire repos (500K-1M lines) in single inference

Demo (internal only):

• Task: “Refactor authentication from session-based to JWT across Django backend (200K lines)”
• LTM-1 execution: Analyzed entire codebase, identified 127 files needing changes, generated migration plan, implemented changes
• Human validation: 85% accurate (15% errors requiring manual fixes)
• Time: 2 hours (vs. 2-4 weeks manual engineering)

2023: Series A and 100M Token Breakthrough

Series A (February 2023): $117 Million

• Lead: CapitalG (Alphabet’s growth fund)
• Additional: Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil, Nat Friedman, Jane Street Capital
• Valuation: $320 Million
• Purpose: Scaling team (12 → 40), LTM-2 development (100M tokens), 2,000+ A100 GPUs

CapitalG’s lead (Alphabet/Google’s investment arm) signaled:

• Strategic interest: Google Cloud seeking AI coding tools (competing with GitHub/Microsoft)
• Technical validation: Google engineers (DeepMind, Google Brain alumni) reviewing Magic’s research
• Distribution: Potential Google Cloud integration

Jane Street Capital (quantitative trading firm) investment notable:

• Technical depth: Jane Street employs 500+ OCaml engineers—deeply technical team
• Use case: Jane Street needing AI understanding massive OCaml codebases (millions of lines proprietary code)

LTM-2 breakthrough (October 2023):

Architecture innovations:

1. Infini-attention: Novel attention mechanism—O(n) complexity, constant memory
2. Hierarchical compression: Compressing older context (preserving semantic meaning, reducing token count)
3. Dynamic retrieval: Searching 100M tokens for relevant sections (not attending to all)
4. Multi-GPU inference: Distributing 100M context across 8-16 GPUs

Result: 100 million token context window—7.5 million lines of code, entire codebases + documentation + git history.

Benchmarks (December 2023):

• HumanEval: 82% pass@1 (vs. GPT-4: 67%, AlphaCode: 34%)
• Multi-file generation: 75% accuracy generating changes spanning 10+ files (manual validation)
• Codebase Q&A: 90% accuracy answering architecture questions (senior engineer evaluation)

2024: Series B, Autonomous Engineering, Enterprise Pilots

Series B (February 2024): $320 Million

• Lead: CapitalG, Sequoia Capital
• Additional: Elad Gil, Nat Friedman, Atlas Venture, Jane Street, new strategic investors
• Valuation: $1.5 Billion (unicorn status)
• Purpose: Autonomous engineering platform, enterprise pilots, 3,000+ H100 GPUs, commercial launch prep

By mid-2024, Magic transitioned from research to product:

Autonomous software engineer (beyond code generation):

1. Task planning: Breaking features into sub-tasks (20-50 steps)
2. Implementation: Writing code across multiple files (10-50 files per feature)
3. Testing: Generating tests, running test suites, debugging failures
4. Documentation: Updating docs, API references, architecture diagrams
5. Code review: Self-reviewing (checking for bugs, edge cases, best practices)

Enterprise pilots (June 2024 – Present):

• Fortune 500 bank: Modernizing legacy COBOL systems (10M+ lines)—Magic understanding COBOL, generating Java equivalents
• E-commerce unicorn: Migrating monolith to microservices—Magic analyzing dependencies, proposing service boundaries, generating initial implementations
• Healthcare tech: HIPAA compliance audit—Magic analyzing codebase, identifying security issues, proposing fixes

By February 2026:

• 90+ employees (60 research/engineering, 20 product/ops, 10 sales/partnerships)
• 50+ companies in private beta (Fortune 500, unicorns, YC startups)
• LTM-2 improvements: 100M tokens stable, <5 second cold start, 95% codebase Q&A accuracy

Founders & Key Team

Eric Steinberger (CEO) brings unconventional strategic thinking from professional poker—long-term planning, probabilistic reasoning, risk management. His self-taught AI journey (poker → RL → transformers → long context) provides fresh perspective unburdened by academic conventions. Obsession with memory systems informs Magic’s architecture.

Sebastian De Ro (CTO) provides deep technical expertise from Google Brain—attention mechanisms, transformer optimizations, efficient architectures. His research on linear attention, sparse attention, and memory-augmented transformers directly enabled LTM-2’s 100M token breakthrough.

Yi Tay (Chief Scientist) is transformer efficiency expert from Google Brain—co-created UL2 (unified language learner), Flan-T5, sparse attention mechanisms. His papers on efficient transformers (cited 5,000+ times) provide theoretical foundations for long-context models.

Funding & Investors

Seed (May 2022): $28 Million

• Lead Investor: Atlas Venture
• Additional Investors: Elad Gil, Nat Friedman (ex-GitHub CEO)
• Purpose: Core research team, GPU infrastructure, LTM-1 prototype (10M tokens)

Series A (February 2023): $117 Million

• Lead Investor: CapitalG (Alphabet’s growth fund)
• Additional Investors: Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil, Nat Friedman, Jane Street Capital
• Valuation: $320 Million
• Purpose: Scaling team (12 → 40), LTM-2 development (100M tokens), 2,000+ A100 GPUs

Series B (February 2024): $320 Million

• Lead Investors: CapitalG, Sequoia Capital
• Additional Investors: Elad Gil, Nat Friedman, Atlas Venture, Jane Street, Strategic Investors
• Valuation: $1.5 Billion (unicorn status)
• Purpose: Autonomous engineering platform, 3,000+ H100 GPUs, enterprise pilots, commercial launch, team expansion (40 → 90)

Total Funding Raised: $465 Million

Magic deployed capital across:

• Compute infrastructure: $150-200M in H100/A100 GPUs (3,000+ GPUs for training, 500+ for inference)
• Research talent: $100-150M in compensation (researchers from Google, OpenAI, Meta—$400K-1M+ packages)
• Novel architecture: $50-80M R&D on attention mechanisms, memory systems, multi-GPU inference
• Enterprise platform: $40-60M building autonomous agent orchestration, testing, deployment
• Strategic partnerships: $20-40M pilot programs, integrations, customer success

Product & Technology Journey

A. LTM-2 (Long-Term Memory Model)

100 million token context window:

What it means:

• 7.5 million lines of code (average 13 tokens per line)
• Entire codebases: Startup (100K lines) = 1.3% context, Enterprise app (5M lines) = 67% context
• Multi-repo: Frontend (500K lines) + Backend (1M lines) + Mobile (500K lines) + Docs (200K lines) + Infrastructure (100K lines) = 2.3M lines (31% context)

How it works:

# Simplified LTM-2 inference architecture

class LTM2Model:
    def __init__(self):
        self.context_window = 100_000_000  # 100M tokens
        self.hierarchical_memory = HierarchicalMemory()
        self.sparse_attention = InfiniAttention()
    
    def process_codebase(self, codebase_files):
        """
        Process entire codebase (millions of lines) into memory.
        """
        # Step 1: Tokenize all files
        all_tokens = []
        file_boundaries = []
        
        for file in codebase_files:
            tokens = self.tokenize(file.content)
            all_tokens.extend(tokens)
            file_boundaries.append({
                'path': file.path,
                'start': len(all_tokens) - len(tokens),
                'end': len(all_tokens)
            })
        
        # Step 2: Build hierarchical memory
        # - Local attention: Within files (8K tokens)
        # - Global attention: Cross-file (100M tokens, sparse)
        self.hierarchical_memory.build(all_tokens, file_boundaries)
        
        # Step 3: Index for retrieval
        # Vector embeddings for fast search
        self.index = self.build_vector_index(all_tokens)
    
    def generate_feature(self, task_description):
        """
        Generate multi-file feature from task description.
        """
        # Step 1: Understand task
        task_embedding = self.encode(task_description)
        
        # Step 2: Retrieve relevant code
        # Search 100M tokens for relevant files, functions, classes
        relevant_contexts = self.search_memory(task_embedding, top_k=50)
        
        # Step 3: Plan changes
        # Break task into sub-tasks (file modifications, new files, tests)
        plan = self.plan_implementation(task_description, relevant_contexts)
        
        # Step 4: Generate code
        generated_files = []
        for step in plan.steps:
            # Attend to entire codebase (100M tokens) + relevant contexts
            code = self.generate_with_long_context(
                task=step,
                codebase_context=self.hierarchical_memory,
                relevant_context=relevant_contexts
            )
            generated_files.append({
                'path': step.target_file,
                'content': code,
                'action': step.action  # 'create', 'modify', 'delete'
            })
        
        return generated_files
    
    def generate_with_long_context(self, task, codebase_context, relevant_context):
        """
        Generate code using Infini-attention (100M tokens).
        """
        # Infini-attention: O(n) complexity, constant memory
        # - Compress distant context (1M+ tokens away)
        # - Full attention to relevant context (50K tokens)
        # - Local attention to current generation (8K tokens)
        
        hidden_states = self.sparse_attention.forward(
            query=task.embedding,
            key_values=codebase_context.get_compressed(),
            relevant_mask=relevant_context.attention_mask
        )
        
        # Decode tokens
        generated_code = self.decode(hidden_states)
        return generated_code

Performance:

• Inference speed: 5-15 seconds for 100M token context (cold start), <1 second incremental
• Memory: 80-120GB (distributed across 4-8 H100 GPUs)
• Accuracy: 90%+ on codebase Q&A (human expert validation)

B. Autonomous Software Engineer

Capabilities:

1. Feature implementation (multi-day tasks):

Task: "Add social authentication (Google, GitHub) to our SaaS app"

Magic's execution (autonomous):

Day 1: Analysis & Planning (2 hours)
- Analyze existing authentication (Django backend, React frontend, 200K lines)
- Identify files needing changes: 15 backend files, 8 frontend components, 2 database migrations
- Research libraries: django-allauth (backend), react-oauth (frontend)
- Generate implementation plan (25 sub-tasks)

Day 2: Backend Implementation (4 hours)
- Install django-allauth, configure settings
- Create OAuth provider models (Google, GitHub)
- Update User model (adding oauth_provider field)
- Generate database migrations
- Implement OAuth callbacks (handling tokens, user creation)
- Update authentication middleware
- Write unit tests (20 test cases)

Day 3: Frontend Implementation (4 hours)
- Add OAuth buttons to login page
- Implement OAuth flow (redirects, token exchange)
- Update Redux state management (user authentication)
- Add loading states, error handling
- Update user profile page (showing OAuth provider)
- Write integration tests (15 test cases)

Day 4: Testing & Documentation (2 hours)
- Run full test suite (150 tests)
- Debug 3 failing tests (OAuth redirect URL mismatch, CORS issues)
- Update API documentation (new OAuth endpoints)
- Write user-facing docs (how to enable social login)
- Create pull request with detailed description

Total: 12 hours autonomous work (vs. 3-5 days human engineer)

2. Codebase refactoring (understanding architecture):

Task: "Refactor our monolithic Django app into microservices"

Magic's analysis:

Step 1: Dependency Analysis (analyze 500K lines)
- Identify bounded contexts: Authentication (50K lines), Billing (80K lines), 
  Analytics (120K lines), Core (250K lines)
- Map database dependencies: 45 models, 200+ cross-model queries
- Identify API boundaries: 120 internal API calls

Step 2: Service Boundary Proposal
- Propose 4 microservices with clear boundaries
- Generate service interaction diagram
- Estimate data migration complexity

Step 3: Implementation Plan
- Phase 1: Extract Authentication service (2 weeks, low risk)
- Phase 2: Extract Billing service (3 weeks, medium risk - payment data)
- Phase 3: Extract Analytics service (4 weeks, high complexity - heavy queries)
- Phase 4: Core remains monolith (legacy code, high risk to split)

Step 4: Proof of Concept
- Generate Authentication microservice skeleton (FastAPI)
- Implement API gateway (Kong)
- Create database migration scripts
- Generate Kubernetes deployment manifests

Human review: "96% accurate analysis, service boundaries make sense, 
               implementation plan realistic. Proceeding with Phase 1."

C. Codebase Understanding

Answering architecture questions:

Question: "Why is our checkout API slow? It takes 3-5 seconds."

Magic's analysis (searching 2M lines):

Root Cause: N+1 query problem in order creation

Evidence:
1. Analyzed checkout endpoint (order/views.py:145)
2. Found loop creating order items (line 167):
   
   for item in cart.items:
       OrderItem.objects.create(order=order, product=item.product, ...)
       # This executes 1 SQL query per item (N queries)
   
3. Traced database queries (Django debug toolbar logs):
   - 1 query for cart
   - N queries for order items (N = avg 8 items)
   - Total: 9 queries (vs. 2 queries optimal)

4. Measured performance impact:
   - Each query: 300ms (database in different region)
   - Total delay: 8 * 300ms = 2.4 seconds

Solution (Magic's proposal):
- Use bulk_create() instead of loop:
  
  order_items = [
      OrderItem(order=order, product=item.product, ...)
      for item in cart.items
  ]
  OrderItem.objects.bulk_create(order_items)
  
- Reduces 8 queries → 1 query
- Expected speedup: 2.4 seconds saved → ~1 second total (60% faster)

Human validation: "Correct diagnosis. Implemented fix, checkout now <1 second."

D. Enterprise Features (Planned)

On-premise deployment:

• Hardware: 8x NVIDIA H100 GPUs (for 100M context inference), 500GB RAM
• Pricing: $500K-2M/year (unlimited usage, 100-1,000 engineer organizations)

Security:

• Code privacy: Customer code never sent to Magic servers (processed on-premise)
• SOC 2 Type 2: In progress (Q3 2026)
• Compliance: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 (financial services, healthcare)

Custom training:

• Fine-tuning on company codebases: Learning internal patterns, APIs, architecture
• Cost: $100K-500K per project (training on 1M-10M lines, 3-7 days on H100s)

Business Model & Revenue

Revenue Model (Planned Launch: Q4 2026)

Estimated economics (post-launch):

• CAC: $1K (individual), $50K-200K (enterprise, 6-12 month sales cycles)
• LTV: $10K+ (individual, 5+ year retention), $5M-50M+ (enterprise, multi-year contracts)
• Gross Margin: 50-60% (H100 inference costs high initially, improving with scale/optimizations)
• Projected 2027 ARR: $50-100M (assuming 500-1,000 enterprise teams + 5,000-10,000 individual developers)

Target Customers

1. Tech companies (60%): Unicorns, public companies (500-5,000 engineers)—modernizing legacy code, scaling teams
2. Financial services (25%): Banks, hedge funds (100-500 engineers)—COBOL migrations, compliance automation
3. Enterprises (15%): Fortune 500 non-tech (50-200 engineers)—digital transformation, technical debt

Competitive Landscape

Cognition Devin ($2B valuation): Autonomous coding agent, 13.86% SWE-bench (published metric)
Imbue ($1B valuation): Reasoning agents, optimality models, code refactoring focus
Poolside ($3B valuation): AI coding assistant, 70-80% acceptance rate, 100K+ users
GitHub Copilot ($10B+ value): Code completion, 10M+ users, 35-40% acceptance
Cursor ($400M valuation): AI-first IDE, integrated experience
Replit Ghostwriter: Browser-based, 1M+ users

Magic Differentiation:

1. 100M token context: 500x larger than competitors (GPT-4 200K, others 4K-32K)
2. Autonomous execution: Multi-day tasks (not just suggestions)—planning, implementing, testing, documenting
3. Architecture reasoning: Understanding system design (microservices, databases, dependencies)
4. Codebase-first: Analyzing entire repos (not single files)—coordinating multi-file changes
5. Founder pedigree: Poker player’s strategic thinking + Google Brain attention mechanism expert

Impact & Success Stories (Private Beta)

Fortune 500 Bank

Legacy modernization (10M+ lines COBOL): Magic analyzed COBOL codebase, understood business logic, generated Java equivalents. Result: 40% of COBOL successfully migrated in 6 months pilot (vs. 10-15% expected manual), $20M+ estimated annual savings (reducing mainframe costs).

E-commerce Unicorn

Monolith → microservices: Magic analyzed 2M line monolith, proposed service boundaries, generated authentication microservice (50K lines FastAPI). Result: 95% accurate service decomposition (architect validation), authentication service deployed to production (handling 1M+ requests/day), proof-of-concept for remaining services.

Healthcare Tech Company

HIPAA compliance: Magic audited 500K line codebase, identified 47 security issues (SQL injection risks, insufficient encryption, logging sensitive data). Result: 90% accurate findings (security team validation), 35 issues fixed autonomously by Magic, 12 requiring human review.

Future Outlook

Product Roadmap

2026: Commercial launch (Q4), on-premise deployment, SOC 2 Type 2
2027: Multimodal understanding (diagrams, UI mockups → code), agent collaboration (multiple Magic agents working together)
2028: Self-improving agents (learning from mistakes, updating strategies), AGI research (software engineering as stepping stone)

Growth Strategy

Enterprise dominance: Fortune 500 adoption (tech, finance, healthcare)
Developer platform: API enabling third-party agents, IDE integrations (VS Code, IntelliJ)
Open research: Publishing attention mechanism breakthroughs, contributing to open-source

Long-term Vision

Magic aims to create autonomous software engineers replacing 30-50% of junior/mid-level engineering work—enabling companies to scale without linear headcount growth. With $465M funding, $1.5B valuation, 100M token context (500x competitors), and enterprise pilots validating product-market fit, Magic positioned for IPO ($10B-20B+ valuation) or strategic acquisition (Google, Microsoft) within 5-7 years as autonomous coding becomes standard practice.

FAQs

What is Magic AI?

Magic builds AI software engineer with 100 million token context window (7.5M lines of code)—enabling autonomous feature implementation, codebase refactoring, and architecture understanding across entire repositories.

How much funding has Magic raised?

$465 million total across Seed ($28M), Series A ($117M, led by CapitalG), Series B ($320M, CapitalG/Sequoia), achieving $1.5 billion valuation (February 2024).

Who founded Magic?

Eric Steinberger (professional poker player turned AI researcher) and Sebastian De Ro (ex-Google Brain researcher on attention mechanisms), founded 2022 in San Francisco.

What is LTM-2?

Long-Term Memory 2—Magic’s foundation model with 100 million token context window (500x larger than GPT-4’s 200K)—using novel Infini-attention mechanism enabling O(n) complexity for processing entire codebases.

When will Magic launch commercially?

Private beta currently (50+ companies). Commercial launch planned Q4 2026 with individual developer tier ($100-200/month), team tier ($500-1K/engineer/month), and enterprise on-premise deployment.

Conclusion

Magic has established itself as pioneering autonomous software engineering platform, achieving $1.5 billion valuation, $465 million funding from CapitalG/Sequoia/Nat Friedman, and 90+ researchers building LTM-2 foundation model with revolutionary 100 million token context window—500x larger than GPT-4. With ability to analyze entire codebases (7.5M lines simultaneously), plan multi-day refactors, implement features autonomously across dozens of files, and reason about system architecture, Magic proves that AI can function as autonomous software engineer—not just coding assistant.

As software engineering faces talent shortages (30M developers globally, insufficient for AI-driven transformation), demand for autonomous engineering grows exponentially—tech companies scaling without linear headcount, financial services modernizing legacy systems, enterprises eliminating technical debt. Magic’s 100M context window (breakthrough attention mechanisms), autonomous execution (multi-day task planning), architecture reasoning (microservices, databases, dependencies), and founder pedigree (poker strategist + Google Brain researcher) position it as transformative infrastructure for software development. With enterprise pilots validating Fortune 500 use cases (legacy modernization, microservices migration, compliance automation) and $465M funding enabling aggressive commercial launch, Magic is positioned as compelling IPO candidate ($10B-20B+ valuation) or strategic acquisition target within 5-7 years as autonomous software engineering replaces 30-50% of junior/mid-level development work, fundamentally transforming how software is built.

Related Article:

• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/6sense/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/abnormal-security/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/abridge/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/adept-ai/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/anduril-industries/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/anthropic/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/anysphere/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/applied-intuition/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/attentive/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/automation-anywhere/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/biosplice/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/black-forest-labs/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/brex/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/bytedance/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/canva/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/celonis/
• https://eboona.com/ai-unicorn/cerebras-systems/